Quality of Reporting in Randomized Trials

Important considerations in calculating and reporting of sample size in randomized controlled trials

Background: The calculation of the sample size is one of the most important steps in designing a randomized controlled trial. The purpose of this study is drawing the attention of researchers to the importance of calculating and reporting the sample size in randomized controlled trials.    Methods: We reviewed related literature and guidelines and discussed some important issues in s...

Quality of reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials.

CONTEXT Noninferiority and equivalence trials aim to show that the experimental treatment is not clinically worse than (noninferior) or clinically similar to (equivalent) a control active treatment. These study objectives imply particular planning and analysis. OBJECTIVE To assess the methodologic quality of reports of randomized controlled trials of noninferiority and equivalence. DESIGN W...

reporting quality assessment of randomized controlled trials published in nephrology urology monthly journal

context randomized controlled trials (rcts) are important tools for evidence-based health care decisions. it is, therefore, important that they be conducted and reported with the highest possible standards. the aim of this study was to evaluate the reporting quality of the rcts published in nephrology urology monthly journal and to examine whether there was a change over time in the reporting q...

reporting quality assessment of randomized controlled trials published in hepatitis monthly

Quality of reporting of randomized trials as a measure of methodologic quality.

CONTEXT The evaluation of the methodologic quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is central to evidence-based health care. Important methodologic detail may, however, be omitted from published reports, and the quality of reporting is therefore often used as a proxy measure for methodologic quality. We examined the relationship between reporting quality and methodologic quality of publi...